a few feedbacks on diffrent TL reports..

Morchaoron

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,714
for once i agree with the whiners in that thread, the way they work with the TL's now is terrible (on the other hand, most of the TL's are terrible too)
 

SevenSins

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
468
lol :/

Mythic play their own game, they assign TL's just for the community to make them think they actually have a say in DAoC, but shafting them at the same time.

That's what it looks like at the moment, GOA should share some of their popularity increase with Mythic so that maybe they'll play our game instead of their own :p
 

Eroa

Banned
Joined
Jan 8, 2004
Messages
1,138
Endurance regeneration buff currently takes up 8 buff slots for a full group. This means a grouped shaman has to use 40% of his buffs to give a group end regen.
Tabled - need specifics


Way to many responses like this tbh, and how the hell can they be more specific?
 

Frosen

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 13, 2004
Messages
104
LOL @ this feedback tbh they are taking the piss with these TL's, i can't believe there is one TL out there willing to make another report ever again with such feedback.

They don't even try to hide the fact they don't give a damn about what we think anymore, why don't they just close TL's.

The day WOW comes out is the day i'l lauch real hard, real evil :p

Mythic makes me feel so :wij: :puke:
 

Alan

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
3,972
You think thats pathetic, look at the wizard TL report WITH feedback. all 4 words and one copy/paste from patch notes.

Pathetic Mythic, just wish they read here too :)
 

Oro

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Mar 3, 2004
Messages
691
Couldn't find the cabby one. He's probably sitting in a corner somewhere gibbering. To be honest though, the class is pretty much fine with a few minor tweaks at most needing done. Things like the animation delay when you cast disease and you don't know what enemies its stuck on. I notice that this problem is similar to the sorc one in NF where the animation for area root is delayed a few secs as well.
 

Damon_D

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
585
The peopel reading these reports and are giving the feedback obviously dont have a clue about the game , or just random's bashes there heads into the keyboard as a way of typing it.............
 

Balbor

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 9, 2004
Messages
688
shamen TL does understand the difference between Hybrid healers and healers, Shamen are healers, they get 1 spec point, have 3 spell lines and can't spec weapons/defence. Friers, wardens and Bards can spec weapons and are hybrid healers and therefore have access to Ignore Pain.

Heal font effect all disease and DOT casting classes not just Shamen its only because they get disease for free they think it effects them harder. A cabalist has to spec for AOE Disease so in theory heal fonts are effecting them harder than shamen.

Shamen are without a doudt the best non main healing healer class in the game
 

Turamber

Part of the furniture
Joined
May 15, 2004
Messages
3,558
Shaman are healers? Really?? You do know that mentalists HOT spells are better than FRIG's? So are mentalists healers too? *boggle*
 

Alan

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
3,972
Balbor said:
shamen TL does understand the difference between Hybrid healers and healers, Shamen are healers, they get 1 spec point, have 3 spell lines and can't spec weapons/defence. Friers, wardens and Bards can spec weapons and are hybrid healers and therefore have access to Ignore Pain.


So......... mentalists are healers too ?

They can heal, have 1 spec point - 3 lines... and cant spec weapon
 

Balbor

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 9, 2004
Messages
688
Turamber said:
Shaman are healers? Really?? You do know that mentalists HOT spells are better than FRIG's? So are mentalists healers too? *boggle*

um focus caster mean anything to you?
 

Oro

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Mar 3, 2004
Messages
691
Shamen aren't really healers. They get a single target disease same as cabbies but just like cabbies have to spec for the ae version. Just like friars they have little or no reason to spec in their healing line.

Shammy healing tends to be for downtime in PvE but for RvR they can backup heal at best but are more effective at interupting enemy support than trying to heal much.

(My cabby is specced the way he is partly as a result of my experience playing a shammy - its like a shammy without the bits I didn't like).

People complaining that friar or shaman healing is crap should bear in mind that they are only secondary healers and aren't intended to be anywhere near as good as the primaries. However, while shammies are still desirable in groups because they are the realm's primary buffer, friars lose out because they aren't primary anything.

But the only thing that stops friars from getting groups is this nonsensical obsession people have with 1FG combat where roles must be optimised as far as possible.
 

SevenSins

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
468
Oro said:
Shamen aren't really healers. They get a single target disease same as cabbies but just like cabbies have to spec for the ae version. Just like friars they have little or no reason to spec in their healing line.

Shammy healing tends to be for downtime in PvE but for RvR they can backup heal at best but are more effective at interupting enemy support than trying to heal much.

(My cabby is specced the way he is partly as a result of my experience playing a shammy - its like a shammy without the bits I didn't like).

People complaining that friar or shaman healing is crap should bear in mind that they are only secondary healers and aren't intended to be anywhere near as good as the primaries. However, while shammies are still desirable in groups because they are the realm's primary buffer, friars lose out because they aren't primary anything.

But the only thing that stops friars from getting groups is this nonsensical obsession people have with 1FG combat where roles must be optimised as far as possible.
Shamen AE disease is baseline Roo, PBAOE disease is Cave specline :)
 

Solarius

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 4, 2004
Messages
134
Slightly o/t, I thought it was slightly humourous the disparity in responses given to the Nightshade TL and the Infiltrator TL, NS concerns on general assassin issues were "design decisions" whereas Inf concerns on general assassin issues were "under discussion". Issues were Decoy and Climb points on keeps!

You'd think that they'd at least TRY to have a sense of unity in the responses.

A similar thread pointing these out appeared on the VNBoards, but under the dubious suggestion that Mythic favoured albion to the detrement of Midgard and Hibernia, I'm not quite convinced of that, but with so many things that have happened over the years, it's easy to see why some do!
 

Iceflower

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 31, 2003
Messages
529
>while shammies are still desirable in groups because they are the realm's primary buffer, friars lose out because they aren't primary anything.

The friar situation is something us darkness runies are very happy about :D

>But the only thing that stops friars from getting groups is this nonsensical obsession people have with 1FG combat where roles must be optimised as far as possible.

But, but, what would the game be all about if you didnt have the quest for the holy realm point to focus on? ;)

Maybe they get a better life when NF arrives but somehow I doubt it, the FGvsFG mentality runs deep now. The future on Excalibur looks much better than on Prydwen though.
 

Ctuchik

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
10,467
Balbor said:
shamen TL does understand the difference between Hybrid healers and healers, Shamen are healers, they get 1 spec point, have 3 spell lines and can't spec weapons/defence. Friers, wardens and Bards can spec weapons and are hybrid healers and therefore have access to Ignore Pain.


yes but Mythic cant decide WHERE to put us!

either as a list caster or a secondary healer! NOT switch between both when deciding what kind of spells/RA's we should have!!

either we are list caster OR secondary healers FULL out!
 

Iceflower

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 31, 2003
Messages
529
> Run through (exploiting the Line of Sight) is still a major problem for casters and melee, there needs to be a fix for this issue.
Tabled - specificis

Found this little nugget on the RM report.... Mythic testers must be very much into fair and square gameplaying styles :D

As for the responses on the shaman report, imaging working for a boss that gives you that kind of feedback on your performance....horror :(
 

Balbor

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 9, 2004
Messages
688
Ctuchik said:
yes but Mythic cant decide WHERE to put us!

either as a list caster or a secondary healer! NOT switch between both when deciding what kind of spells/RA's we should have!!

either we are list caster OR secondary healers FULL out!

there is no secondary healers, justr healers or hybrid healers
 

Kami

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,254
That's one of the poorest TL reports I've ever seen, the guy should know by now that he has to be concise but details when dealing with Mythic. Reading between the lines he's struggling to get his points across.
 

Morchaoron

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,714
Iceflower said:
> Run through (exploiting the Line of Sight) is still a major problem for casters and melee, there needs to be a fix for this issue.
Tabled - specificis

Found this little nugget on the RM report.... Mythic testers must be very much into fair and square gameplaying styles :D

As for the responses on the shaman report, imaging working for a boss that gives you that kind of feedback on your performance....horror :(

whats even worse is that after more then 3 years mythic still doesnt know what he's talking about ><
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom