F
Furr
Guest
Soooo what scores do you lot get on 3mark 2003? i will publish mine as soon as i download the program
F
Furr
Guest
- Thread starter
- #2
erm 1351!!!!
Ok then! is 3mark03 made for the geforce fx or sumin cause i swear my mark should be higher than that!
Ok then! is 3mark03 made for the geforce fx or sumin cause i swear my mark should be higher than that!
D
Deadmanwalking
Guest
- Thread starter
- #3
LMAO! d/l atm ill tell u what i get 
F
FatBusinessman
Guest
- Thread starter
- #4
Yeah, I got a shite mark in 3DM03 too. Probably because I only have a lowly GeForce 4 Ti4200 card.
</sarcasm>
</sarcasm>
D
Deadmanwalking
Guest
- Thread starter
- #5
Eventually gettign it to run all the way i got .... 5784 no idea if thats good or not?
Athlon 2700+
512 3200 ddr
Radeon 9700 pro (Overclocked) Mem: 350 mhz core: 380 mhz
=/
That was just messing about^^
Athlon 2700+
512 3200 ddr
Radeon 9700 pro (Overclocked) Mem: 350 mhz core: 380 mhz
=/
That was just messing about^^
D
Deadmanwalking
Guest
- Thread starter
- #6
having said that i just ran it again and got about 700 less =/
very strange not to mention normaly when it hits the Second game the battle it restarts the comp !!
WTF!
very strange not to mention normaly when it hits the Second game the battle it restarts the comp !!
WTF!
F
Furr
Guest
- Thread starter
- #7
I also have the GeForce 4 Ti4200, hmmm
W
Will
Guest
- Thread starter
- #8
Running a DX 9 benchmark on a DX 8 card might explain the really low scores.
Benchmarking is bad, mm'kay.
Benchmarking is bad, mm'kay.
E
Embattle
Guest
- Thread starter
- #9
If you have a GF4 you'll get a crap score
T
throdgrain
Guest
- Thread starter
- #10
Im not even going to bother .
S
Skyler
Guest
- Thread starter
- #11
I stopped bothering with 3dmark when 2001 came out.. I have used the more recent ones but I didnt really take notice, I only used them to look at the eye candy.. I wont even bother downloading 2003..
D
Deadmanwalking
Guest
- Thread starter
- #12
I also hate benchmarking but as i had 2 dif gfx cards i thought id try it
not to mention teh eye candy!
not to mention teh eye candy!
F
FatBusinessman
Guest
- Thread starter
- #13
*waits for Xavier to resume his 3DMark-bashing*
A
adams901
Guest
- Thread starter
- #14
What a load of shit, after the wings of fury none of my tests produced a Frame rate greater than 40FPS.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=341749
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=341749
D
Deadmanwalking
Guest
- Thread starter
- #15
hmm i got more than 40 fps on troll and a few placs on battle of proxycon.
A
adams901
Guest
- Thread starter
- #16
you got 40 on troll?, my troll was 27.6 fps 
D
Deadmanwalking
Guest
- Thread starter
- #17
heheh mind u my 9700 pro speeds are up a bit so that could be it =/
A
adams901
Guest
- Thread starter
- #18
post your compare link, i wanna compare
F
Furr
Guest
- Thread starter
- #19
You have ALOT of memory
F
Furr
Guest
- Thread starter
- #20
D
Deadmanwalking
Guest
- Thread starter
- #21
Only just signed up to future mark BS but here is my results with standard gfx speeds.
I will fiddle around with it and get back to u later on with teh results
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=342384
The ones i did before where 5700 mark.
I will fiddle around with it and get back to u later on with teh results
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=342384
The ones i did before where 5700 mark.
I
Insane
Guest
- Thread starter
- #22
read my sig...
(courtesy of Will, i think )
(courtesy of Will, i think
)