![]() |
|
||||
|
Important - Radar Accusations
Do not post radar accusations on this board. Take them to RightNow.
Discussing Radar is OK as long as it's not just spam/flamebait, but keep the names/guild names etc. out of it. If you believe someone has seriously cheated, the WORST thing you can do is to post on FH. GM's need proof, and if someone sees themselves posted about on FH, they'll either stop, or become far more cautious and thus harder to catch. So please, if you seriously think you see someone cheating, sent it to rightnow, and then keep quiet about it. Edit for some unimaginative people: This includes accusations of using other third party cheats and stuff like hiding in walls yadda yadda - post it to RightNow. If it's something that RightNow/GOA are meant to deal with send it to them.
__________________
Humberton Blackguard - http://www.roguishness.com/war/ "Without the use of a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to make a parody of whine that someone won't mistake for the real thing." "Flim's idea of emo is noticing he's ran out of beer and yawning" - Roo Boing Last edited by Flimgoblin; 20th July 2005 at 12:43 PM. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||
|
realy dont see the point in why ppl cant post about ppl that they think uses radar - to me it just seems like a way for u to bust u ban counter. btw ? any way we can see it ?
__________________
Hib/excal Music - Firbolg Bard Clicc - Luri ranger LGM Fletcher Clucc - Sylvan Animist Esiul - Celt Champion /houseface 3350 ----------------------- Mid/pryd Ciiix - xx Savage |
|
|||
|
you are not moderating, you are dictating.
a) you closed a post down in RVR forums where someone was posting if one of the RVR classes was balanced. Was a good post typical of this forum before anyone could say anything you close it off (there was no flames in it) b) Somone remakes the post to continue the discussion you close it off again and ban that person. c) Somone makes a 3rd post about it and you do nothing. And the 3rd post runs its course and people post their views. (yey) d) You ban me for putting the name of 3 of the most prolific radar users on my server on a post about radar users. Then make a sticky "afterwards" saying not to name radar users. I will resist the urge to comment about the effectiveness of right now in catching radar users. Actually the worst thing for a radar user is to be named and shamed. And that doesnt break any forum rule. having you moderate these forums is just causing the relevent posts to RVR issues that people want to talk about get closed off. Already about half the posts on here are becoming gratz threads and the number of good posts that we are interested in is declining. Perhaps leave this post running to allow people to express their views on what your doing to these boards. |
|
|||
|
Have said it many times this forum shouldnt be moderated at all before someone starts spamming ALOT like open 10 new threads in a row etc thats really all that should earn you a ban the rest doesnt matter at all..
__________________
SOLD: Stormscale/Alliance Nuc L60 Rogue - Grand Marshal Nuclear L60 Mage SOLD: RR9L3 Enchanter - Nuclear RR8L3 Blademaster - Einherjar RR8L2 Valewalker - Psychox RR7L4 Bonedancer - Boneprincess RR7L0 Minstrel - Thunderex |
|
|||
|
GOA does nothing about radar users cause i dont think they even have the tools to check it. The most obvious radar users are still not banned and we cant even speak their names on this forum ? I agree with censi about what he said on naming and shaming, you just giving them a radar free ticket.
stop the useless banning for people speaking their minds and make this a forum where things get actually discussed instead of closed when some cheater might get hurt.
__________________
Nadhia - Hero RR8L5 Chianna - Ranger RR4L2 Lavelle - Bard RR7L7 |
|
||||
|
I have some nice s/shots of one sorc and a wizard popping in all funny places in emain last night whenever I was unstealthing to rebuff
Will put them online in a day or two, and you tell me if you consider those places "normal" to show up! Will also go through the proper channels of course
__________________
Celtic Fist |
|
||||
|
Quote:
its wrong to expect players to police this game, it should be up to goa or mythic and as far as im aware, the only radar users who have been caught has been from player intervention as you said using pics / vids. now its fun to play with the radar users and unstealth and then stealth and watch them run into you but i dont expect to be the one who has to video it, make the post to rightnow and then be told to stop persecuting people. while im at it, to not allow people to name and shame suspected radar users is draconian, backwards and not really in the spirit of these forums to discuss aspects of the game. whether i like it or not, its always nice to see peoples thoughts on the game and what they like and dislike - whether its in spanish broken english or just some nob whining about a zerg. if a radar name and shame thread turns into persecution and breaches FH coc then yeah close it, but i cant understand why you wont let players use this vital tool to discuss it with names.
__________________
Angrysquirrel Post Mortem GM afaik & Bard both rr7 and a bit and both ml7 and a bit, both in bed. was playing scotland the lvl 19 healer and fuiudbh the 50 shammy (wheres your buffs now m8?) in mid ive replaced daoc with sex, no adding please. |
|
||||
|
As far as i can see banning people who openly expressing the views and concerns about an issue that is rvr related, is just another nail in the FH forums. The mods seem to be shutting down thread after thread if its topic is anything else other than a "Gratz Blah Blah on Ding lvl2", etc.
Sooner or later i bet there will be sticky telling us exactly what types of topics we are allowed to make posts about. Stop the dictating, start the moderating and FFS ease your fingers off the ban button.
__________________
----------- K8P SH of Doom Destruction |
|
|||
|
It's their forum, they can ban whoever they want.
Although I was kinda disappointed there was no whine in my last grats thread
__________________
US/Kay - Alactrity
WAR - Karak Eight Peaks - Order - Rulke <Aesir's Blade><The Last Prophecy><Jack Herer> |
|
||||
|
Quote:
If you accuse someone specific of using radar, and they aren't, you are libelling them under UK law. What's more, FreddysHouse is jointly and seperately liable for this libel, because they effectively act as "publisher" of your comments. While it's unlikely that anyone would ever sue you or FH for libelling them, FH can't take the risk.
__________________
-- WoW: Altus Chillers - Runetotem Laliana - Dead Priest "The direct corolation between my blue bar and your green bar is such that when the blue bar is empty you, the recipient of healing, shall not be able to receive healing. Or in simple language dont pull when i say /oom, noob!" |
|
||||
|
Quote:
im passionate about this name and shame thing tbh, so im curious! |
|
||||
|
it's not so much a libel thing as an in-game reputation thing...
Accusing people of radar on FH does two things: 1. encourages more people to use radar because "everyone is using it" 2. smears the name of innocent people when people get it wrong - sure there's radar users out there and you might be right when you post it. If you're right - it does nothing to stop them radaring. If you're wrong you've smeared the reputation of someone innocent. Censi - you should know better, hence a 1-day ban. It's only been increased because you insist on creating alt accounts and posting - if you wish to discuss a banning you can PM moderators, not just post more of the same thing that got you banned. The post I closed down was "Just a question about savages? where it was asked of people to post only yes or no - don't post any discussions, just yes or no" - that's a postfarm not a discussion. It was locked. Aloca posted exactly the same thing, that's taking the piss. Someone later posted "give reasons why you like savages" - that's a discussion thread, that gets to live. Now I don't have to justify myself to you, but I thought I'd give people an explanation incase the blindingly obvious nature of the lockings wasn't clear. |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| accusations, important, radar |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|