Pentagon 9/11

[Tom]

Ok ok so its a conspiracy theory, yeah yeah, but if true (and I use that word hesitantly) then it does raise some rather interesting questions...

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/pentagon.html#Preloader

[Mobius]

Yeah thats freaky.
Its really weird but I get more scared watching conspiracy stuff than horror/thriller movies. I remember watching a JFK/LHO conspiracy programme then having to turn the light on after. So strange, yet I can watch scary movies and not even flinch.

[tris-]

i seen this a while ago. makes more sense than any of the shit the news tryed to tell us. i also posted about this ages ago and everyone went off on one then wonder what will happen this time.

[Tom]

Personally I think the conspiracy theory is all a bit doubtful, there seems too many holes in their version of events. Oh well, something to brighten up an otherwise boring Sunday!

[Aada]

it makes sense actually

[Wij]

It makes no sense. They have no actual theory. They just suggest that various things looked like they'd been done by something other than a 757 but it's not self-consistent, it's not always suggesting the same thing. It's just selective distraction and cherry-picking of the evidence.

Get a clue.










Oh no ! The lizard men !!!!!!!!!1

[Paradroid]

I saw this a couple of weeks ago too .

There's an hour long documentary call "911 - In Plane Site" which goes into all the details of the Pentagon attack, and, of several wierd incidents in New York that day (appart from having no airforce to protect them etc).

After both towers were hit - but before they collapsed (/demolished) - there are pictures (shown only once) of another huge plume of smoke (10 stories high) off to the North of the trade centre, possibly indicating another explosion? This completely negates the idea that it was "just" planes flying into buildings that caused all the carnage.

Anyone seen the spin-off from the X-files, a program called "The Lone Gunmen"? In March 2001 it's first ever episode was aired, and it was called "The Pilot". In this episode a "group" of government men orchestrate a bogus terrorist attack to further their careers/profits. What they do is highjack a plane using romote control technology - technology which we already have - and try to fly the plane into The World Trade Centre Towers!!! Their plan was that numerous "crackpot" countries would be climbing over themselves to take the credit for such an attack at the heart of America, so they could then start a war or two. The difference between this piece of fiction and reality is that no one has claimed responsibilty for 911. No one.

[Paradroid]

Originally Posted by Wij

It makes no sense. They have no actual theory. They just suggest that various things looked like they'd been done by something other than a 757 but it's not self-consistent, it's not always suggesting the same thing. It's just selective distraction and cherry-picking of the evidence.

Get a clue.


Oh no ! The lizard men !!!!!!!!!1

Ah, Wij, wij, wij, wij, wij....you've missed the completely obvious. A "theory" is just that. A "theory" has no evidence to back it up.

Therefore, the idea that a 757 flew into the Pentagon is just that, it's a "theory". There's no evidence at all to suggest that a Boeing 757 flew into the Pentagon. It's a theory.

There's actually loads of evidence to suggest it was a much smaller projectile (the video footage & damage to the facade). And if you take notice of the damage caused right through 3 of the Pentagons rings (fnarr), it looks like it was a missle (bunker buster).

Unless, of course, the pilot managed to fly a passenger jet through a small hole in such a way as to completey destroy the aircraft - leaving nothing behind? But you can clearly see an open book on a small stool just inside the Pentagon building, which doesn't suggest an inferno hot enough to vaporise fuselage (experts have stated that there should have been enough fuel on the plane to burn for a couple of days at least). And what about the engines? Have they just vanished too?

I'm all for getting evidence to substantiate theories, so I'll consider the Pentagon attack by a 757 to be a theory, until I see some evidence (like the half-dozen or so security tapes they have from multiple angles - that would be nice).

[nath]

Don't be stupid Paradroid! People in power would never lie to the public, that would be wrong!

[ECA]

what the governments of the world didn't tell the truth?

SOMEONE CALL A GM!

[old.Tohtori]

I bet the 9/11 never happened....have to investigate and proove it to be an american porgapanda conpirsacy.

[Jonaldo]

Does America even exist?

[Wij]

Originally Posted by Paradroid

Ah, Wij, wij, wij, wij, wij....you've missed the completely obvious. A "theory" is just that. A "theory" has no evidence to back it up.

Therefore, the idea that a 757 flew into the Pentagon is just that, it's a "theory". There's no evidence at all to suggest that a Boeing 757 flew into the Pentagon. It's a theory.

There's actually loads of evidence to suggest it was a much smaller projectile (the video footage & damage to the facade). And if you take notice of the damage caused right through 3 of the Pentagons rings (fnarr), it looks like it was a missle (bunker buster).

Unless, of course, the pilot managed to fly a passenger jet through a small hole in such a way as to completey destroy the aircraft - leaving nothing behind? But you can clearly see an open book on a small stool just inside the Pentagon building, which doesn't suggest an inferno hot enough to vaporise fuselage (experts have stated that there should have been enough fuel on the plane to burn for a couple of days at least). And what about the engines? Have they just vanished too?

I'm all for getting evidence to substantiate theories, so I'll consider the Pentagon attack by a 757 to be a theory, until I see some evidence (like the half-dozen or so security tapes they have from multiple angles - that would be nice).

No no. Get a clue. Have you actually read about the incident properly or just read the conspiracy sites ? Surprise surprise, most of their 'facts' are lies. Edited photos, irrelevant photos, photos of something that are labelled as something else.

http://www.geocities.com/roboplanes/757.html

I could give you loads more links but I can't be arsed. Get real.

Annoyed-Wij.

[Jonaldo]

That website is a hoax!!121!!!1

[tris-]

Originally Posted by Wij

Edited photos, irrelevant photos, photos of something that are labelled as something else.

well, these guys must have some crazy photoshop skllz. i dlike to see some of the better people here take a photo of a 757 crashed into a building and take out every trace of it. even keep the grass in perfect condition where the plane SHOULD of skidded along the ground..

even the most skilled fighter jet pilots probably couldnt fly a 757 10 foot off the ground without stalling it and hitting the ground first.

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero...erreurs_en.htm < one of the better sites to let you make your own mind up.