![]() |
| Sponsored Links |
|
||||
|
i know enough to not use it.
if there to fucking lazy to unban a hacked account, and not only that, they are to lazy to even check it up! then i don't want anything to do with it. and yes you CAN check that stuff. i dare say that 99% of all that's using the internet in one way or another have a permanent IP. you just check if a different IP have connected with that account at the time of the banning. sure, nothing says its not just him using a different PC but its still a fairly small chance of that happening. but then again were talking ppl that play cheater strike and the likes here so.... from that view i can see why they don't. still a retarded way of dealing with their customers tho.
__________________
Quote:
( >.<) Kitty needs a hug! (")_(") http://www.orcnet.info |
|
||||
|
Quote:
There are anywhere between 600,000 and 1.3 million people using steam at any one time, averages would point to this meaning easily over a million seperate users every day. (source: Steam: Game and Player Statistics) If only 1% of those users are involved in hacking incidents, that is 10 thousand users a day. You expect Valve to investigate 10000 seperate user's cases every day? That is just over 400 cases an hour; just under 7 cases per minute - and that assumes they're at it 24 hours a day. How many people would they have to employ to be capable of doing this? More than one certainly, so that assumes more than £20k a year? For what? The people they are banning have already paid for the game, they pay no subscription so the only losses are potential products the person might buy, and that ignores the fact that a certain amount of those banned will go straight back to the shops and buy another account in order to keep playing. The amount of money involved is hardly enough to support the employment of one person, which, we've already established, isnt enough to do the job. So is it 'fucking laziness'? A 'retarded' way to treat 'customers'? Or just plain common sense? VAC is actually very accurate in its detection of hackers - it may take a while to catch them, but if someone is hacking you can bet they'll be gone before long, I've seen it happen too many times. So why should they waste money on people who are cheating? The amount of people wrongly banned must be so infinitestimally small that it just isnt worth bothering about, it would be a "retarded way to treat customers" if they wasted money trying to do it, I'd rather they spent the money on developing a better game tbh. Either way - they take a hard line with cheaters, which can only be a good thing as long as stupid amounts of people are not banned for no reason, which they clearly arent because steam is still popular. When I play CSS I'd rather play in an environment with less cheaters and strict rules than a hippie human rights convention where everyone and his dog has wallhacks.
__________________
[center]Alias RoaЯ/PikeyЯeaXion in FPS's Proud Member of {KEA} "Its the decisions you make, when you have no time to make them, that define who you are." Last edited by Dukat; 24th June 2008 at 08:25 PM. |
|
||||
|
Pikey owns stilts
__________________
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| account, beware, spammers, steam |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Steam account phising | Mabs | Action & FPS Games | 8 | 8th April 2007 11:26 PM |
| Kid trying to steal a steam account gets counterpwned | Pirkel | Off-Topic | 19 | 8th November 2006 12:30 PM |
| Steam. . .it really does make you steam up. | Zaq | Half-Life series | 41 | 7th April 2004 07:41 PM |
| Where are the spammers? | Tom | General | 35 | 13th February 2004 12:05 PM |