|
What I dont understand is that if OSX is sooo much better than any windows OS ever, wouldn't they make a lot of money NOT locking you into their hardware?
If Apple felt secure in
A) the looks selling overpriced shit ( you'd get more sales from people buying them as a "PC" on which you can install whatever the fuck you want ) [ yes I know you can do that now - but who would buy that ovepriced crap?! - and the people who buy shit like that dont know you can do that anyway ]
B) Mac OS X being good ( because selling a lot of OS units = $$$ )
then they would make more money not-bundling them.
They don't want people to be able to buy the OS seperately and evaluate it honestly, all you have is the rabid apple nutters who cant see that apple is WORSE than MS in terms of being restrictive.
Its like MS buying alienware and only letting you run windows on their selfsold hardware - it would fail so badly because its a shit idea, and yes there is a small but stupid band who do not see this and like donating money to Steve Jobs.
Its the same reason the ipod/iphone will dissapear - only a small band of wankers will be left buying it - everyone else will be using players that dont restrict formats/personal usage no matter how good the interface is.
The second apple loses its pseudo elitism is the second all the pseudo elitists abandon it and will move on to something else to be elitist about.
Its the same people who like bands when they are new but then become mainstream and suddenly they dont like it anymore.
Its that bunch of twats wankers and ***** who buy apple.
|